Tuesday, February 05, 2008

University applications

honestly, i'm happy i'm not applying to college these days. the new york times reports today on immense increases in the number of applicants to many universities across the country. to my delight, "my" three universities - dartmouth, harvard, university of chicago - are all mentioned in the first paragraph. the pressure on high schoolers in this country is tremendous. certainly, there is a large group of applicants from top-ranking private or public high schools whose academic and non-academic accomplishments are simply unbelievable. as a representative example, i have one particular family in mind (those of you who know me know who i'm talking about) with three kids graduated from ivies and now in medical school and a fourth one applying this year: each one of them spent high school taking dozens of AP courses, excelling in sports, pursuing non-trivial independent research in the sciences, spending their summers traveling and studying in europe, competing in (and generally winning) math and science competitions across the country, and (in the case of the youngest one) also impressing everyone with her talent as a singer. the top universities in the country must get many of these applicants, whose resumes evoke what is normally accomplished in liberal arts colleges and whose entire school careers seem to have been designed for their college admissions application. but, i've also seen the flipside of education in this country through my teaching in cambridge, boston, and here in the south side of chicago. in these schools, high school classrooms are falling apart, experimental equipment is from the 1950's, drop-out rates are alarmingly high, enrollment in college is shockingly low, teachers have no formal background in the subject they teach, some classrooms lack teachers altogether, and any curiosity or desire to learn is stifled. it's difficult to reconcile these two pictures of education in the united states.

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have two comments on this:

1. Have you had the joy of receiving a copy of "02138" magazine? We got a copy due to alumni status and it's just amazing. I actually saved the first issue because the article on how to get your child into Harvard absolutely blew my mind. I really need to get around to doing a blog post about it. Some of the things that caught my eye were a) the extremely programmatic suggestions. "Your child needs to start learning Mandarin at age 3. In high school, your child needs to start a business or write a commercially viable piece of software. Etc." b) most of the suggestions were kind of expensive "a lindblad expeditions trip will help to expose your child to the world ($15,000)" or "Riding and dressage are great hobbies to become seriously involved in". c) uniqueness is more important that joy. The perfect example of this was a suggestion that your child try team sports. However, if they turn out to not be the star player, quarterback, or team captain, they should do more "unique" sports like rock climbing. Finally, d) there were pictures of kids at various ages with their clothing listed like a fashion catalog. Even the 6-year-old was wearing $200 jeans.

2. There's one additional very interesting thing about college admissions. I'm a very firm believer in the small liberal arts college. Those colleges are having a really hard time with admissions right now. It's not an issue of too many or too few students, it's a gender problem... not enough men. Even after biasing admissions, Whitman is at something like 60-40 women and lots of schools are climbing towards 70-30 distributions. It appears that men are leaning more towards not going to college at all or going to larger schools.

3:40 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home